Some of these articles are in Adobe Acrobat to
download the reader - Adobe
Acrobat Reader for PDF formatted documents
Click on the underlined article to read it.
"...Anyone
with common sense can deduce this distillery is bad for the
Army's mission at Letterkenny, bad for Greene Township and bad
for Franklin County. Mr. Welch and his investors seem more
concerned about their investments and potential profits, and
gaining 35-plus jobs. As self-proclaimed patriots, they should
be more concerned for the potential loss of thousands of jobs at
the Letterkenny Army Depot. ..."
Ethanol plant would harm depot's mission
by Carl McAfee,
Letter to the Editor of the Public Opinion, March 31, 2006
(Click here)
"...It makes no sense whatsoever to
situate an industry well proven to be volatile literally within
yards of expensive munitions intended to protect soldiers....
Our supporting structures (roadways, emergency response
teams, railways, etc.) are neither intended to support this type
of activity nor will Penn Mar be in any way responsible for
ensuring that these and other support structures be
improved...."
Ethanol
plant does not belong near depot
by
Carolyn Griffin-Yeager, Guest Essay, Public Opinion, May
25, 2006
(Click to read)
More about
Letterkenny Army Depot issues.
Guest Essay: We pay dearly for ethanol by
DeEtta Antoun, Director, Citizens for a Quality Environment,
The Public Opinion, April 12, 2006
(Click to read article)
"...Anyone with common sense can deduce
this distillery is bad for the Army's mission at Letterkenny,
bad for Greene Township and bad for Franklin County. Mr. Welch
and his investors seem more concerned about their investments
and potential profits, and gaining 35-plus jobs. As
self-proclaimed patriots, they should be more concerned for the
potential loss of thousands of jobs at the Letterkenny Army
Depot. ..."
Ethanol plant would harm depot's mission
by Carl McAfee,
Letter to the Editor of the Public Opinion, March 31, 2006
(Click here)
Public Opinion Guest Essay:
Ethanol answers still lacking by
Neil Cline, Tuesday, March 7, 2006
Guest essay: Don't let ethanol plant endanger jobs at depot By Mary Burkholder
Ethanol
plant doesn't belong here Letter to the
Editor of the Public
Opinion by Betty DeVos
(Click
to read)
Ethanol plant wouldn't be good for Franklin County by Leonard Kriner, Public Opinion Letter to the Editor, July 7, 2005
Ethanol
plant would benefit only those who stand to profit from it by
DR. WILLIAM PETRI III, Public Opinion Letter to the Editor, July 7, 2005
Writer's
ethanol letter is a fairy tale by Joseph
Hoagland, Public Opinion, July
2, 2005
Some seek to preserve quality of life here DeEtta Antoun, Director, Citizens for a Quality Environment, Public Opinion, June 28, 2005
There's no need to destroy Siloam Dam. by Mrs. Sherman L. (Rhonda) Glunt, Public Opinion Letter to the Editor, June 20, 2005
LIDA
has dismal record on land. Joseph A. Fields Colonel, Ordnance Corps
United States Army (Retired) Public Opinion
Letter to the Editor, June 11, 2005
(Complete
Letter to the Editor)
Ethanol plant doesn't belong. by Jay Miller, Public Opinion Letters to the Editor, June 10, 2005
Ethanol plant would turn people away. by Laura Stacy-Kurtz, Public Opinion Letters to the Editor, June 8, 2005
Ethanol Plant could ruin health. by Karen Bitner, Public Opinion Letter to the Editor, June 4, 2005 (Click for full letter)
Overcapacity
created by new subsidized ethanol refineries, coupled with
falling demand makes ethanol a loser...
By:
C.
L. “Bud” Carty,
sent
to the Public Opinion, Letter to the Editor, May
4, 2005
(not yet published)
Too much is unknown about ethanol plant. Neil Cline, Public Opinion Guest Essay, May 20, 2005
Thanks to those who helped depot. DeEtta Antoun, Director, Citizens for a Quality Environment, Public Opinion, May 18, 2005
Make plant pay if there's odor. Nick Bitner, Public Opinion, May 17, 2005
Ethanol plant poses more dangers. George Schmidt, Public Opinion, May 16, 2005
Ethanol plant would endanger us. Fred Bucci, Public Opinion, May 12, 2005
Express opposition to ethanol plant. Hugh Baker, Public Opinion, May 7, 2005
Ethanol plant doesn't belong here. Robert Kirkner, Public Opinion, April 29, 2005
Ethanol plant requires very thorough review. Kathy Leedy, Public Opinion Editorial Page Editor, April 27, 2005
Speak out against ethanol plant. Carolyn Griffin-Yeager, Public Opinion, April 27, 2005
Proposed ethanol plant will have many adverse effects on Franklin County. Fred Antoun, Public Opinion Guest Essay, April 15, 2005
Greene shouldn't grant variance for ethanol plant. Kathy Leedy, Public Opinion Editorial Page Editor, April 16, 2005
Many are affected by ethanol plant. Nancy Barnes, Public Opinion, April 12, 2005
Supervisors made right call in postponing ethanol forum. Kathy Leedy, Public Opinion Editorial Page Editor, March 31, 2005
Ethanol factory spurs skepticism. Editorial, The Sentinel, March 31, 2005
We don't need an ethanol plant here. Barb Baker, Public Opinion, March 29, 2005
County doesn't need hazards that come with ethanol plant. DeEtta Antoun, Director, Citizens for a Quality Environment, Guest Essay, Public Opinion, March 28, 2005
Company shouldn't get tax breaks. W. D. Cooper, Public Opinion, March 24, 2005
Ethanol plant poses real dangers. Carl McAfee, Public Opinion, March 9, 2005
Plant is an accident waiting to happen. Jay Miller, Public Opinion March 9, 2005
Letter from Franklin County residents to LIDA asking them to terminate Agreement of Sale with Penn-Mar Ethanol, LLC. Over 500 Letters were sent to LIDA between February 25, 2005 and March 7, 2005
Ethanol plant would disrupt lives. Grace Hawley, Public Opinion, February, 28, 2005
Ethanol plant poses dangers. DeEtta Antoun, Director, Citizens for a Quality Environment, Public Opinion, February 15, 2005